Saturday, February 25, 2017

Christmas Day 2013



by Little Bobby,

When We get right down to it 3/4s of Americans have little if anything to be merry about this year. Whether or not that changes by CHRISTMAS 2014 is up to You The People.

This afternoon I received an email from Mrs. Kidd, Devvy wrote: “I decided a couple of months ago not to write my usual Christmas day column. Was thinking about which old one and you brought up the 2008 piece so I went with it.” Please do Yourself a favor, read Devvy’s CHRISTMAS Day 2008 Column.

A couple of hours later Devvy forwarded an email where the sender included three quotes by former President Theodore Roosevelt. Let’s read them, Mr. Roosevelt: To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.

And: We cannot afford to differ on the question of honesty if we expect our republic permanently to endure. Honesty is not so much a credit as an absolute prerequisite to efficient service to the public. Unless a man is honest, we have no right to keep him in public life; it matters not how brilliant his capacity.

And: There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities.

For years America’s presidents regardless of which rocke-party are best described as Citizen stabbing, conniving liars. AMERICA the skull & bones pack via George W. rocke-pub Bush gave US 9/11. Adding 9/11 to bilderberg Barack rocke-dem Obama's healthcare/nightmare Shows You two of the worst examples.

Our congress, court systems and injustice department/dept. of corruption are as putrid hearted as the occupiers of what has become the offal pile office. To further my point when assistant attorney general Viet D. Dinh was invited to bilderberg `02 where alfalfa club, bohemian grove owl Rumsfeld announced the military industrial-congressional complex was going to attack Iraq in 2003 - Dinh was a pratt house rat. You can verify that here.

Where was Eric pop goes the weasel Holder in `02, at council on foreign relations/pratt house sponsor Covington & Burling. And Eric knew his fellow law partner Stuart pratt rat Eizenstat went to bilderberg 2002. And let no one forget when assistant attorney general Christine Varney flew to bilderberg 2010 and 2011, Holder’s dept. of corruption bought the airline tickets with YOUR tax dollars.

And before I ride on, it is time for James race baiter Cone to deal with the name below Viet D. Dinh’s on the pratt rat’s roster for 2002 belongs to a black, former New York mayor David N. Dinkins. James as to your “liberation theology”, how can you liberate anyone because you don’t have the character or stones to announce who AMERICA’S enemies are?! Personally, I hope James and Cornel West can find it within themselves to turn their lives around in a positive manner. Cornel and James, to begin your Red American, your “First American Studies”, I suggest reading The Soul of the Indian and The Gospel of the Red Man. Two of the three Books I plan on mailing to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue tomorrow.

Since it is CHRISTMAS, let’s look at how to bring about CHANGE In A PEACEFUL MANNER. On Monday December 23rd, I received a copy of a letter originating from - Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. I believe the action alert was first emailed on November 25th. The alert’s copy under the heading -

Tell the NY TImes:
The Evidence Isn't Hard to Find...If You Just Look

“Yesterday New York Times Chief Washington Correspondent David Sanger was the guest on CSPAN’s Washington Journal, where he had this to say about Building 7’s collapse:

We have not found any evidence so far – that doesn’t mean there’s none there – but we’ve not found any evidence so far to suggest that the building collapses were caused by anything other than the two airplanes that flew into them.”

Sanger was responding to a question from a caller who wanted to know why, despite the massive billboard standing right outside the New York Times Building, the paper of record had failed to “fairly and objectively cover this crucial issue.”

Now with a senior representative of the New York Times on the record saying, “We’ve not found any evidence so far,” it is time to let Sanger and the editors know that the evidence is there. All they need to do is look and they’ll easily find it. Contact the NY Times Today!

Contact the NY Times Today

Last week over 1,000 people contacted the BBC in response to our action alert regarding the BBC’s one-sided article on the ReThink911 campaign. Let’s surpass that level of support today. Please take 2 minutes right now to contact David Sanger and the NY Times editors. Just copy-paste the letter below, or write your own. Please be sure to Bcc us at AE911Truth so that we can keep a count of how many emails are sent.



Dear Mr. Sanger and Editors of the New York Times,

On Sunday, December 23, 2013, you, Mr. Sanger, told a caller on CSPAN’s Washington Journal that the New York Times had not found any evidence so far to suggest that the collapse of WTC Building 7 was caused by anything other than an indirect result of the airplanes flying into the Twin Towers. I am writing to tell you that the evidence is indeed there, and I urge you to look into it. 2,100 architects and engineers have signed a petition at calling for a new investigation based on this evidence. The following points are just a few from among the growing body of evidence that overwhelmingly supports the conclusion that Building 7 came down by controlled demolition.

Building 7 accelerated downward at absolute free-fall for the first few seconds of its 7-second symmetrical collapse.

• However, a building cannot undergo free-fall if it is meeting any resistance from any of the columns below it, as any resistance would slow the building’s descent.

• Therefore, the lower section of the building could not have been “crushed” by the upper freely falling section.

• The destruction of at least 8 stories of the lower section of the building had to have been accomplished by other means, i.e. explosives or incendiaries, to allow the upper section of the building to fall through it in free-fall. Learn more about the free-fall of Building 7.

• There is clear evidence of melted steel at Building 7, first reported on by the NY Times, and incendiaries in numerous dust samples from Ground Zero.

As you well understand, the implications of the controlled demolition of Building 7 are extraordinary, since it is integral to the 9/11 events, and therefore the question of what happened to Building 7 is of the greatest importance. I thank you in advance for taking the time to seriously examine this crucial issue.


[Name, address]

When I forwarded the letter, I made some changes: “David Sanger and Editors of the New York Times,

David, you don't fool me as your name David E. Sanger appears on the current harold pratt house's roster of rats under Amy Sands.

On Sunday, December 23, 2013, you, David Sanger, told a caller……” I should have read the letter more carefully because I believe December 23, should have been November 23 or 24 an honest mistake on the part of the writer. Here, I just watched Sanger trying to sell Clear Thinkers, lies.

Besides the pratt rat house Sanger is also a member of the aspen strategy group (asg), a pack directed by R. Nicholas pratt rat board member, chatham hyena house panel of senior advisors Burns and co-chaired by Joseph bilderberg, pratt, trilateral Nye and Brent bilderberg, pratt, trilateral Scowcroft. Burns is also a trilateral, plus he’s on the board of the rockefeller maggots brothers fund.

Six of Sanger’s asg black-hearted pals include such low life alfalfas, bilderbergs, pratts and/or trilaterals like Madeline Albright, Condoleezza Rice, Jane Harman, John Deutch, Richard pratt house president Haass and Philip Zelikow, the dishonest 9/11 commission’s executive director.

Six emeritus asg members are Dick alfalfa, owl, pratt, trilateral Cheney; Robert bilderberg, pratt Gates; Dianne alfalfa, bilderberg, pratt, trilateral Feinstein; David bilderberg, owl, pratt, trilateral Gergen; Susan pratt, former trilateral steering committee member, former ambassador to the u.n., current national security advisor Rice and William one time cia & fbi director, alfalfa, owl, pratt, trilateral Webster.

Ladies and Gentlemen, it is Imperative To Know who Your enemies are!!! Next, how much more Effective would Architects & Engineer’s letter to the NY Times have been if Sanger’s secret society affiliations and his putrid hearted associates had been Noted? Please contact Architects and Engineers to ask Mr. Richard Gage to bring all the information forward while encouraging Richard to take up a simple, PEACEFUL, the wolves can’t hide or howl their way out of solution, “Build the models!” I intend to write Richard a letter on Friday. Fact: the wolves are the conspirators, they are the ones who committed a Mass Murder on SEPTEMBER 11, 2001. Please write a letter to:

Richard Gage, AIA
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
2342 Shattuck Ave., Suite 189
Berkeley, CA 94704

Sisters and Brothers, “life” isn’t a popularity contest. I realize many will hate me for pointing out Truths about their beloved rocke-this, rocke-that rat and senator. And then there are those who hate me for providing Real History, along with Telling the Truth about the Bushes, Clintons and Obamas, black on white violence and the lies sold/told by afrocentrists because of my skin color. And then of course there’s my lack of popularity with federal badge wearers. To all who hate me – guess what?! I’m not living a lie, however badge wearers are and they know it. Neither am I deceived, and as AMERICA’S condition relates to the secret societies, 90% of Americans don’t have any idea about the new world agenda (what the wolves howl for in their speeches) being carried right in front of US and behind the scenes.

A current example of behind the scenes agenda is the bilderberg, pratt and trilatertal endorsed trans-pacific partnership treaty, TTP. From a Doctors Without Borders, in French - Medecins Sans Frontiers post on November 13: “For the first time in more than two years, text from the intellectual property chapter of the secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement negotiations has been leaked. Since 2010, the negotiations have been shrouded in secrecy, with none of the current 12 negotiating Pacific rim countries releasing text or information on a trade agreement that will ultimately impact the lives of at least half a billion people.

The TPP currently includes some of the harshest provisions against access to medicines ever included in a trade agreement with developing countries, gutting public health safeguards and leaving them unable to take the steps needed to protect the lives and health of their people above the profit of multinational pharmaceutical companies. For more information, please read MSF’s issue brief and recent statements here:  

MSF Responds to the Leaked TPP Text:

“The leak of the secret text confirms that the US government continues to steamroll its trading partners in the face of steadfast opposition over terms that will severely restrict access to affordable medicines for millions of people. The US is refusing to back down from dangerous provisions that will impede timely access to affordable medicines.

It’s encouraging to see that some governments, including Canada, Chile, New Zealand, Malaysia, and Singapore, are pushing back against some aspects of the US position with their own proposal that better protects access to medicines; what is troubling is that the text also shows that some countries are willing to give in to the US government’s damaging demands. We urge countries to stand strong to ensure that the harmful terms are removed before this deal is finalized.”

Judit Rius Sanjuan, US Manager, MSF Access Campaign

MSF is an international medical humanitarian organization working in over 70 countries worldwide. For more information on MSF analysis and concerns with the TPP visit - See more at: End quote.

Who would be one of the lead U.S. negotiators? I’d say the current secretary of commerce, Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign finance chair, Penny billionaire Pritzker, who for years was a pratt rat board member with Christine bilderberg Whitman, Madeline trilateral Albright, Jami cia Miscik, Fareed scroll & key Zakaria, Colin owl, alfalfa Powell and Fred skull & bones Smith. (A side note: Penny is still a pratt rat, likewise Thomas J. billionaire Prtizker.)

My sister, Dr. Sallie Marie Motch used to work with Doctors Without Borders in Palestine. Sallie wrote a book about the conditions there – Palestine: A Look Inside. Both of Mr. Bobby’s and Mrs. Sallie Motch’s children have tried to be difference makers. Sadly Little Sallie suffered devastating injuries in an auto-accident in 2007 and I doubt if Sis will ever fully recover.

Its midnight, so I’ll finish this tomorrow.

 A week ago I read quite a few posts about the proposed trans-pacific treaty, a treaty which will ship two to three million more jobs out of America and also drive up the cost of medicine which of course profits the behemoth multinational pharmaceutical companies. Plus the treaty restricts Clear Thinkers from posting Truths on the internet. And in one of those posts I read the peterson institute has released a study promoting ttp.

First off Peter bilderberg Peterson used to chair the council on foreign relations, the pratt house in New York. Peter succeeded (scroll down the webpage) David founding bilderberg, maggot Rockefeller sr. and David succeeded John bilderberg, warren commission McCloy. And both current cfr co-chairs are bilderbergs, Carla Hills and Robert Rubin. Those who track the bilderberg pack already know Rubin was invited to bilderberg 2013 held in England where prime minister David hyena Cameron was their damn host!

Obama’s health nightmare aside, as to America’s completely out of whack health care costs, Mrs. Elizabeth Rosenthal has written one of the best series I know of; the link goes to an index of Her Columns at the NY Times.

I believe it was in one of Elizabeth’s Columns where I read Johnson & Johnson wasn’t developing new antibiotics due to low profit return. I may have read the info at the website of a Doctor I Trust, Dr. Mercola. And as things relate to Obama’s nightmare bill, it’s easy to figure out why I haven’t read where drug companies or insurance companies were against it, due to their profits are set to go through the roof. Meanwhile the American People will be screwed, which happens to be the u.s. government’s favorite pastime.

Here’s an excellent breakdown of what Our president, sec. of commerce and us. trade representative endorse via the ttp treaty. Ladies and Gentlemen for your Children’s Sakes please read it.

On a similar train of thought, I can’t see how Johnson & Johnson promotes itself as a family company since the firm is a corporate chatham house sponsor. As of yesterday, Johnson & Johnson is between John Swire & Sons LTD and Jordan’s Embassy. Reading the names of pratt and chatham corporate sponsors is educational. More multinational drug company sponsors are GlaxoSmithKline, Merck and Pfizer.

Everything can be Changed, or the AMERICAN People can continue to allow banksters, lobbyists & lawyers to dictate policy as prescribed by the secret societies who are protected by Holder’s dept. of corruption.

Let’s look at division and banksters in general through the modern day crooked Naacp, a group no longer deserving capital letters. Today while tracking I read Benjamin rhodes scholar Jealous has been replaced by Lorraine Miller. Lorraine’s Naacp bio: “Miller is the first African-American and third woman to serve as an officer of the U.S. House of Representatives. The House clerk manages the daily operations of the U.S. House, overseeing nine departments and 270 people.

Miller previously served as senior adviser and director of intergovernmental relations to now-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and has nearly two decades of experience working for the House. In addition to working for Pelosi, Miller has worked for two other then-Speakers, Jim Wright (D-Texas) and Tom Foley (D-Wash.), as well as Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.). Miller has also worked in the executive branch, having served in the Clinton administration as deputy assistant for the House side in the White House Office of Legislative Affairs. She served as bureau chief for consumer information at the Federal Communications Commission after serving four years as the director of government relations for the Federal Trade Commission. Miller is close to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and also worked for Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.). She also served in on the legislative affairs team in the Clinton White House. In 2004, Miller was elected president of the Washington, D.C. Branch NAACP branch and became part of the national NAACP board of directors in February 2008.” End quote.

Let the record show Tom rocke-dem Foley, who died in October used to chair the trilateral commission’s north american division.

Bottom line - Lorraine has watched house of rats members drive off and fly off to beaucou’ bilderberg, pratt and trilateral functions. And I’ve typed more than once in this series Nancy Pelosi’s husband is one of the grove’s owls. Paul’s a member of the grove’s “stowaway camp” with two Rockefeller maggots and Alexander R. Mehran to point out four. AMERICA is it a random coincidence one board member for the federal reserve bank in San Francisco (the home of the bohemian club) is Alexander R. Mehran?

Something else, wasn’t it Nancy house of rats speaker Pelosi who commented for her fellow rats to hear in reference to bilderberg Obama’s proposed nightmare - Pass it and then read it?

I believe most Americans will agree two of the sorriest bankster firms besides the federal reserve, bank of england and the bank of international settlements are HSBC and Goldman Sachs. Lorraine would you like to announce why the hell goldman sachs board member Adebayo Ogunlesi sits on the Naacp’s national board of directors? Lorraine, Readers should also know Adebayo Ogunlesi (born in Nigeria) went to Oxford which helps to explain why he sits on the Americans for Oxford board.

Hmm oxford, the home, the lair of the Cecil mason Rhodes’ - rhodes scholarships.

Who set up the rhodes scholarships, Cecil’s dream after he died? His buddy baron Nathan Mayor Rothschild. (It was N. M. who financed Cecil while he was putting together De Beers, the diamond monopoly.) N. M’s great grandfather was Mayor Amschel Rothschild, the patriarch of the modern day ratschild bankster dynasty. Today is Sunday the 29th, and I just checked to make sure Rothschild North America still sponsors the pratt house.

The name above Ogunlesi’s on goldman’s board belongs bilderberg steering committee member James pratt rat Johnson, who Barack got down on his knees before and begged with at bilderberg `08 to head up his lice-vice presidential candidate selection committee.

Cornel West, who was designated Johnson’s right hand? None other than a fecal faced lawyer, Eric pop goes the weasel Holder, AMERICA’S dishonest, race baiting black attorney general. West what are your thoughts on how difficult it is find an honest individual with a law degree - ivy league or not?

Citizens when You Think about it the ivy league and its professors are a very confused bunch, especially after reading some of the school’s mottos. Brown - In God We Hope. Columbia – In Thy light we shall see light. Dartmouth – A voice crying out in the wilderness. Princeton – Under God’s Power She Flourishes. Penn – Laws without morals are in vain. Harvard – Truth. Yale – Light and truth.

Since the skulls, quill & daggers and the balance of the secret societies, rocke-maggots and most ivy league professors won’t like this, or anything else I’ve typed, can the rest of US Agree - they’ve been playing “God” for long enough?

Recently I read Mr. Gary Allen has taken the journey; I thought Gary was still alive. Among Mr. Allen’s Books were None Dare Call It A Conspiracy and The Rockefeller File. Mr. Allen’s Books taught me a lot, and Gary was Right On Target with His rocke-dem/rocke-pub analogy.

From None Dare Call It A Conspiracy – Gary: “In his The Intimate Papers Of Colonel House, Professor Charles Seymour refers to the "Colonel" as the "unseen guardian angel" of the Federal Reserve Act. Seymour's work contains numerous documents and records showing constant contact between House and Paul Warburg while the Federal Reserve Act was being prepared and steered through Congress. Biographer George Viereck assures us that "The Schiffs, the Warburgs, the Kahns, the Rockefellers, and the Morgans put their faith in House… Their faith was amply rewarded.” Let the record show Charles Seymour was a member of skull & bones class of 1908. Seymour was also a founding cfr member and later Yale’s president from 1931-51.

Now let’s go back to the founders of bones, the German illuminati. Gary: “Karl Marx was hired by a mysterious group who called themselves the League of Just Men to write the Communist Manifesto as demagogic boob-bait to appeal to the mob. In actual fact the Communist Manifesto was in circulation for many years before Marx' name was widely enough recognized to establish his authorship for this revolutionary handbook. All Karl Marx really did was to update and codify the very same revolutionary plans and principles set down seventy years earlier by Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Order of Illuminati in Bavaria. And, it is widely acknowledged by serious scholars of this subject that the League of Just Men was simply an extension of the Illuminati which was forced to go deep underground after it was exposed by a raid in 1786 conducted by the Bavarian authorities.”

In a nutshell Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, a We the People document in 1776 and Weishaupt whelped the modern day illuminati who strive to enslave the Globe in 1776. Weishaupt was a master mason and yes indeed the bones pack is rooted in masonry. The Weishaupt link takes a while to load; it is Chapter 6 from Mr. David Rivera's FINAL WARNING: A History of the New World Order. Mr. Rivera furthered my education on many important subjects.

Now let’s look at one of the hyenas who whelped the chatham house, also known as the royal institute of international affairs, the pratt house’s evil twin sister. Gary: “Lord Alfred pilgrim Milner, wealthy English man and front man for the Rothschilds, served as paymaster for the International bankers in Petrograd during the Bolshevik Revolution. Milner later headed a secret society known as The Round Table which was dedicated to establishing a world government whereby a clique of super-rich financiers would control the world under the guise of Socialism. The American subsidiary of this conspiracy is called the Council on Foreign Relations and was started by, and is still controlled by Leftist international bankers.”

Some rocke-maggot history, Gary: “After the Bolshevik Revolution, Standard of New Jersey bought 50 per cent of the Nobel's huge Caucasus oil fields even though the property had theoretically been nationalized. (O'Connor, Harvey, The Empire Of Oil, Monthly Review Press, New York, 1955, p.270.)

In 1927, Standard Oil of New York built a refinery in Russia, thereby helping the Bolsheviks put their economy back on its feet. Professor Sutton states: "This was the first United States investment in Russia since the Revolution." (Ibid, Vol.1, p.38) Shortly thereafter Standard Oil of New York and its subsidiary, Vacuum Oil Company, concluded a deal to market Soviet oil in European countries and it was reported that a loan of $75,009,000 to the Bolsheviks was arranged. (National Republic, Sept. 1927.)

Wherever Standard Oil would go, Chase National Bank was sure to follow. (The Rockefeller's Chase Bank was later merged with the Warburg's Manhattan Bank to form the present Chase Manhattan Bank.) In order to rescue the Bolsheviks, who were supposedly an archenemy, the Chase National Bank was instrumental in establishing the American-Russian Chamber of Commerce in 1922. President of the Chamber was Reeve Schley, a vice-president of Chase National Bank. (Ibid, Vol.11, p.288) According to Professor Sutton: "In 1925, negotiations between Chase and Prombank extended beyond the finance of raw materials and mapped out a complete program for financing Soviet raw material exports to the U. S. and imports of U. S. cotton and machinery.” (Ibid, Vol.11, p.226) Sutton also reports that "Chase National Bank and the Equitable Trust Company were leaders in the Soviet credit business." (Ibid, p.277)

The Rockefeller's Chase National Bank also was involved in selling Bolshevik bonds in the United States in 1928. Patriotic organizations denounced the Chase as an "international fence." Chase was called "a disgrace to America… They will go to any lengths for a few dollars profits." (Ibid, Vol.11, p.291)

Congressman Louis McFadden, chairman of the House Banking Committee, maintained in a speech to his fellow Congressmen:

"The Soviet government has been given United States Treasury funds by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks acting through the Chase Bank and the Guaranty Trust Company and other banks in New York City. Open up the books of Amtorg, the trading organization of the Soviet government in New York, and of Gostorg, the general office of the Soviet Trade Organization, and of the State Bank of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and you will be staggered to see how much American money has been taken from the United States' Treasury for the benefit of Russia....” (Congressional Record, June 15, 1933.)

Sutton shows that there is hardly a segment of the Soviet economy which is not a result of the transference of Western, particularly American, technology.

This cannot be wholly the result of accident. For fifty years the Federal Reserve-CFRRockefeller-lnsider crowd has advocated and carried out policies aimed at increasing the power of their satellite, the Soviet Union. Meanwhile, America spends $75 billion a year on defense to protect itself from the enemy the Insiders are building up.” Two side notes: None Dare Call it a Conspiracy was published in 1971, the $75 billion figure has grown to $800 plus billion, and in Mr. Eustace Mullin’s Murder by Injection, Eustace let the cat out of the bag about David Rockefeller opening an office for Chase bank in Moscow in 1973.

Back to Gary: “The New York Times reported one week later on October 13, 1966: "The United States put into effect today one of President Johnson's proposals for stimulating East-West trade by removing restrictions on the export of more than four hundred commodities to the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe…Among the categories from which items have been selected for export relaxation are vegetables, cereals, fodder, hides, crude and manufactured rubber, pulp and waste paper, textiles and textile fibers, crude fertilizers, metal ores and scrap, petroleum, gas and derivatives, chemical compounds and products, dyes, medicines, fireworks, detergents, plastic materials, metal products and machinery, and scientific and professional instruments."

Virtually every one of these "non-strategic" items has a direct or indirect use in war. Later, items such as rifle cleaning compounds, electronic equipment and radar were declared "non-strategic" and cleared for shipment to the Soviet Union. The trick simply is to declare almost everything "non-strategic." A machine gun is still considered strategic and therefore may not be shipped to the Communists, but the tools for making the machine guns and the chemicals to propel the bullets have been declared "non-strategic." Meanwhile, nearly 50,000 Americans have died in Vietnam. The Viet Cong and North Vietnamese receive 85 percent of their war materials from Russia and the Soviet bloc nations. Since their economies are incapable of supporting a war, the Communist arm of the conspiracy needed help from the Finance Capitalist arm. The United States has been financing and equipping both sides of the terrible Vietnamese war, killing our own soldiers by proxy. Again, the landscape painters in the mass media have kept the American public from learning this provable fact.

Not surprisingly, the Rockefellers have been leaders in championing this bloody trade. On January 16, 1967, one of the most incredible articles ever to appear in a newspaper graced the front page of the Establishment's daily, the New York Times. Under the headline "Eaton Joins Rockefellers To Spur Trade With Reds" the article stated:

"An alliance of family fortunes linking Wall Street and the Midwest is going to try to build economic bridges between the free world and Communist Europe. The International Basic Economy Corporation, controlled by the Rockefeller brothers, and Tower International, Inc., headed by Cyrus S. Eaton Jr., Cleveland financier, plan to cooperate in promoting trade between the Iron Curtain countries, including the Soviet Union…"

International Basic Economy Corporation (IBEC) is run by Richard Aldrich, grandson of Federal Reserve plotter Nelson Aldrich, and Rodman Rockefeller (CFR). On October 20, 1969, IBEC announced that N M Rothschild & Sons of London had entered into partnership with the firm.”

Like or hate me, the last two sentences lay it out for Those who can add 2 + 2. A Crystal Clear case of rockefeller maggots and rothschild rats working/walking hand in hand while building a created enemy, the U.S.S.R.

Gary: “This means that the Rockefellers and Eatons have a monopoly on the transfer of technological capability to the supposed enemies of the super-rich, the Soviet Union. According to the Times: "Mr. Eaton acknowledged the difficulties that Amtorg's representatives had encountered here in trying to arrange licensing agreements with American companies. ’As you can imagine,' he said, 'it is almost impossible for a Russian to walk into the research department of an American aerospace company and try to arrange the purchase of a patent'." End quote. Please smoke on that awhile.

I very much appreciate Mr. Allen because Gary gave Sir Antony Sutton credit for His Research; so many writers haven’t mentioned Antony’s Spot On - hard to believe - Revelations, which is a shame. Sir Sutton’s Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development, 1917 to 1930 went to the printers in 1968. In 1971 Antony published Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development, 1945 to 1965. After more research Antony published National Suicide; Military Aid to the Soviet Union in 1973, which was followed up in 1986 by The Best Enemy Money Can Buy. Bottom line - We have been had, and I’m trying to Show Everyone how bad.

In 1976 Mr. Allen published a follow-up to None Dare Call It A Conspiracy, Gary chose The Rockerfeller File for His title and Congressman Lawrence McDonald wrote the Introduction, Mr. McDonald:

Dear Reader:

The super rich in America enjoy power and prerogatives un-imaginable to most of us. Who can conceive of owning a private empire that includes 100 homes, 2,500 servants, untold thousands of luxuries, and untold millions of dollars? America has a royal family of finance that has known such riches for generations. It is, of course, the Rockefellers.

But if the Rockefellers were content with their wealth, if their riches had satisfied their desires, this book would not have been written. And I would not be urging you to read it. Money alone is not enough to quench the thirst and lusts of the super-rich. Instead, many of them use their vast wealth, and the influence such riches give them, to achieve even more power. Power of a magnitude never dreamed of by the tyrants and despots of earlier ages. Power on a world wide scale. Power over people, not just products.

The Rockefeller File is not fiction. It is a compact, powerful and frightening presentation of what may be the most important story of our lifetime, the drive of the Rockefellers and their allies to create a one-world government, combining super-capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.

For more than one hundred years, since the days when John D. Rockefeller Sr. used every devious strategy he could devise to create a gigantic oil monopoly, enough books have been written about the Rockefellers to fill a library. I have read many of them. And to my knowledge, not one has dared reveal the most vital part of the Rockefeller story: that the Rockefellers and their allies have, for at least fifty years, been carefully following a plan to use their economic power to gain political control of first America, and then the rest of the world.

Do I mean conspiracy? Yes, I do.

I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent. You will find the truth-often surprising, sometimes unpleasant, always vital-in the pages that follow. Gary Allen has done a masterful job of combining the hundreds of scattered facts and hidden clues of the Rockefeller puzzle until one unmistakable pattern emerges.

The picture that is revealed when The Rockefeller File is finally opened may shock you. In this book, you will learn why the Rockefellers follow the policies they do, what their goals are, where they intend to take America ... and why it is essential they be stopped.

I urge you to read The Rockefeller File and to encourage your friends to do the same.

November 1975
  Member of Congress

When you get right down to it only a fool would label Mr. McDonald a conspiracy theorist. Citizens it is a widly known fact Larry wasn’t popular among wolves. And when Congressman McDonald Blasted the council on foreign relations and trilaterals on live television, Crossfire, the wolves decided to make an example out of Him. If You’ll watch that Crossfire segment, know up front cfr rat/pratt rat Braden was cia and he loved the cia. Your proof, in 1967 Braden wrote a piece for The Saturday Evening Post called Why I’m Glad The CIA Is Immoral.

Details into what happened to Congressman McDonald and rest of the Passengers and Crew on Korean Airlines Flight 007 are here.

Recently I did a search for brand new members of congress taking ‘welcome to the new world order classes’ at Haavard. The link is to a piece posted by the Harvard Gazette on December 14, 2012: “The presentation by Porter and Jan W. Rivkin, co-directors of the HBS-led U.S. Competitiveness Project, was one of more than a dozen organized by the Institute of Politics (IOP) for the Bipartisan Program for Newly Elected Members of Congress, which for 40 years has shepherded 20 classes of freshmen through its boot camp for policymakers. This year, 37 Democrats and 10 Republicans descended on Harvard for the four-day program, their schedules packed with everything from foreign-policy discussions to workshops on building relationships in Washington to a Fenway Park outing.

After clicking the U.S. Competitiveness Project link - at the homepage, I clicked their “PARTNERS” link The first company named there is Accenture; underneath Accenture, pratt rat sponsor Microsoft. From the website: “Accenture is a global management consulting, technology services and outsourcing company that collaborates with clients to help them become high-performance businesses and governments.…” Hmm – outsourcing.

Accenture’s directors include long time chairman of chatham and pratt sponsor Anglo American, sir Mark chatham hyena, trilateral Moody-Stuart. He is currently a director for Saudi Armco and for years was a director at HSBC, the world’s leading drug money laundering bank, a bank which sent two representatives to bilder-berg 2013, and the bank where James fbi director Comey was named a director in 2013. Readers might like to know the name below Mark Moody-Stuart on the 2007 & 2009 lists of trilateral wolves belongs to Klaus-Peter Muller, the president of the Association of German Banks. Two of Susan pratt rat, former trilateral wolf steering-executive committee member Rice Cameron’s black-hearted friends.

For those who still don’t believe the u.s. congress is their enemy, perhaps more info about rat and skank insider trading will help them see the Light. Next are paragraphs from Evidence of Criminal Activity Inside of Congress posted on April 18, 2013 by Mr. Floyd Brown. Floyd: “Last year, Congress passed the STOCK Act with great fanfare. I’ve written about it before because it had the potential to enhance government transparency. The law had the power to stop insider trading by congressmen.

Now, raise your hand if you actually thought that law would last…

No one? I figured.

In one of the least shocking moves in recent memory, Congress decided to gut the STOCK Act in an under-the-radar vote that crushed any hope for policy-making transparency. In modifying the STOCK Act, Congress killed the provision requiring congressional members and White House staff to post their stock transactions online.

The same day the bill was introduced, the Senate voted on the changes (with no public debate) in a nighttime voice vote. The House followed suit with a similar voice vote – and no debate – the very next day. The whole process happened so quickly that Harry Reid introduced the bill on April 11, and it was signed by President Obama on April 15.

You see, rather than build trust, our representatives would rather cover up criminal activity.

House Republican leaders even violated their much trumpeted promise to give the public three days to study any bill before holding a vote.

When the original STOCK Act was passed on April 4, 2012, the media ate it up. President Obama said it was the first step to “help fight the destructive influence of money in politics and rebuild the trust between Washington and the American people.”

But media coverage of the latest changes was virtually nonexistent compared to the triumphant proclamations of a year ago. And the president is dubiously silent this time around.

There’s a silver lining, though! Starting in 2014, the president, vice president, and members of Congress will once again have to disclose their trades. The problem is, the disclosures won’t be placed online where the public or journalists can easily review them. Instead, the disclosures will be extremely difficult to access. Why? National security.

That’s right. Whenever Washington passes an unpopular bill, they often justify it on the grounds of “national security.”

Tom Lee of the Sunlight Foundation explains the tactic this way: “This approach is known as ‘security through obscurity.’ Essentially, the idea is that rather than fixing a system’s flaws, you can just make the system opaque or unusable or unpopular enough that those flaws never surface.” End quote. How many times have the powers that be played their favorite ‘we can’t discuss that’ card due to the information Your request risks national security? The very same congress which has never demanded an audit of the federal reserve bankster cartel.

Some of the best paragraphs I read in 2013 discussing international banksters, the owners of the federal reserve are here. Mr. E.D. Butler writes from Australia. E.D.: “From the beginning of the famous Rothschild dynasty down to the present time Dr. Quigley gives a brilliant picture of the development of a closely-locked International Money Power. He quotes the famous statement made by Reginald McKenna, one-time British Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Chairman of the Midland Bank, who, in addressing a meeting of shareholders of the Bank on January 25, 1924, said, as recorded in his book, Post-War Banking, 'I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can, and do create and destroy money. The amount of finance in existence varies only with the action of the banks in increasing or decreasing deposits and bank purchases. We know how this is effected. Every loan, overdraft or bank purchase creates a deposit, and every repayment of a loan, over­draft or bank sale destroys a deposit.'

A number of public investigations have taken place since Reginald McKenna publicly said what the operators of credit creation had known for centuries, all demonstrating that trading banks create new finances when making loans and advances. Giving evidence before the New Zealand Royal Commission on monetary systems in 1955, Mr. H. W. Whyte, Chairman of the Associated Banks of New Zealand, readily agreed to the realities of credit creation. 'They have been doing it for a long time, but they didn't quite realise it, and they did not admit it. Very few did. You will find it in all sorts of documents, financial text-books, etc. But in the intervening years, and we must be perfectly frank about these things, there has been a development of thought, until today I doubt very much whether you would get many prominent bankers to attempt to deny that banks create credit.' End quote.

To tie more banksters together please read four paragraphs penned by Keith Bradsher from a New York Times piece published on August 5th 1995, Keith: “In a small Swiss city sits an international organization so obscure and secretive that for many years visitors got lost looking for a small plaque next to an otherwise undistinguished doorway.

Control of the institution, the Bank for International Settlements, lies with some of the world's most powerful and least visible men: the heads of 32 central banks, officials able to shift billions of dollars and alter the course of economies at the stroke of a pen. For years, the United States participated in the closed conclaves of the Basel-based bank only as an observer, having turned down a chance to join the bank upon its founding in 1930.” There Keith is mistaken as the first presidents of bis were Americans. Part 11 provides their names, their pilgrim society memberships and Leon bankster Fraser’s (the bis bank’s second president) cfr board member status.

Keith: “Fed officials defend the institution and its meetings as too valuable to ignore. "The information, understanding and analyses acquired at these meetings and through the statistical activities carried out under B.I.S. auspices contribute to more effective and more efficient policies," the Fed said in a blandly worded article in its monthly bulletin, the closest it had ever come to announcing that it had joined the bank.

The Bank for International Settlements plays host to 10 closed-door meetings a year of top officials from the world's 11 most powerful central banks. It coordinates the development of minimum capital standards -- cushions against losses -- for banks around the world; those standards have an indirect effect on interest rates and the availability of loans. And its staff does extensive research on topics of interest to central bankers, including influential work over the last few years on the risks and advantages of derivatives.” A Key in that paragraph is derivatives.

More from E.D.: “Governments do not govern, but merely control the machinery of government, being themselves controlled by the hidden hand. This provocative statement was made by a character in one of Benjamin Disraeli’s novels. The famous British Conservative Prime Minister of Jewish background used his novels to shed light on the suppressed realities of the world. Disraeli clearly was convinced that even in his times the 'hidden hand' was that of an international money power associated with revolutionary groups to subvert traditional society.

Controllers of the news media of the world insist that there is no such thing as a conspiracy operating behind national and international events, but themselves provide evidence of conspiracy by the manner in which they attempt to suppress or distort information which provides a strikingly different picture of world affairs to that generally presented.

When a senior South African Cabinet Minister, Mr. P. W. Botha, attacked the notorious American Council on Foreign Relations praised by Quigley in his work in 1973, stressing that it was dominated by Socialist-minded individuals and was subverting South Africans associated with it, there was a howl of rage and indignation from both the Afrikaans and English press of South Africa. The Pretoria News of September 6, 1973, said that it was ridiculous that an organisation chaired by Mr. David Rockefeller, the well-known international financier, could be pro-Communist. The Pretoria News said that 'A London report said that Western diplomats had received the Botha charge with a mixture of mirth and sorrow.'

And then came the comment that Mr. David Rockefeller 'can safely be presumed to have no interest in supporting an organisation dedicated to world socialism.'

Shortly afterwards, while visiting South Africa, Mr. Rockefeller described the Botha charges as 'absurd' but as will be seen in this examination of censored history, Mr. David Rockefeller and other international financiers have played a major role in financing Communism.

When he opened his Chase National Bank in Moscow in May, 1973, it was at the most prestigious address in Moscow: 1 Carl Marx Plaza. The Rockefellers have for a long time been financing and urging closer co­operation with the Communists. On November 25, 1959, Study No. 7, published by the Council on Foreign Relations, advocated 'building a new international order which must be responsive to world aspirations for peace and for social and economic change... a new international order including states labeling themselves as 'Socialist.’”

In May of 1973 David Rockefeller was urging American Congress to grant favoured nation status to the Soviet Union. As far back as 1955 David Rockefeller was saying that it was 'politically foolish' to ignore Communist China. In July, 1974, the Rockefeller Manhattan Bank started doing business with Red China, the first Western Bank to do this for 24 years. David Rockefeller urged that Red China also be given favoured nation status.

At a press conference in Hong Kong at the time of the Red China deal, David Rockefeller said that apart from the banking arrangement with the Red Chinese, he had discussed with them the possibility of links between the Council on Foreign Relations and the Chinese People's Institute for Foreign Relations. 'I think they were very much interested in knowing more about how we conduct foreign relations and our attitudes on many subjects', he said.

As the amazing Dr. Henry Kissinger has played a major role in advancing closer relations between the United States and both Communist China and Communist Russia his background is of importance. Before Richard Nixon was first elected President in 1968, Kissinger rather contemptuously said that he was unfitted to be the President of the United States. Kissinger had worked for the Rockefellers for years. He is a One World advocate. But when elected Nixon's first major appointment was Dr. Henry Kissinger as his personal adviser on foreign affairs, thus demonstrating the source of real power in the United States. It was Kissinger who prepared the way for the dramatic Nixon change of attitude towards Peking, a victory for the policies of International Finance. Kissinger negotiated the 'peace-with-honour' deal in South Vietnam, leaving South Vietnam with no peace and the prospect of ultimate take-over by the Communists.” End quote.

Let’s see who did George skull sr., David maggot sr. and Evelyn ratschild initially choose to head up the 9/11 commission? None other than Henry bilderberg, owl, pilgrim, pratt, trilateral, alfalfa Kissinger. When the alfalfas dined in 2011 three of Henry’s pals at table 3 were Stephen skull & bones Schwarzman; David alibi, pratt rat Abshire and former fbi director Bill pratt rat Sessions. Sessions since the fbi’s motto is: fidelity, bravery, integrity how many agents in your opinion will contribute to a fund to build and test models of the South Tower and #7?

Three more paragraphs by Mr. Butler: “100,000 Americans have been killed in Korea and Vietnam 'by our own technology. The only response from Washington and the Nixon Administration is the effort to hush up the scandal.' This is the explosive indictment, not of some 'neurotic right-wing extremist', but of Antony C. Sutton, the Western world's most out­standing academic on Western technological and economic aid to the Soviet Empire.

Antony Sutton's carefully documented studies shatters completely the most dangerous myth ever presented to a gullible mankind; a myth accepted by non-Communists as well as Communists and their fellow-travelers. The myth was once stated to me as follows by a young first-year school teacher: 'Communism has certainly been responsible for brutalities with which we cannot agree. But starting with an impoverished Russia in 1917, Communism has in the face of bitter opposition from the capitalist world, progressively built the Soviet Union up to the stage where it is one of the great super-powers in the world. We must admit its tremendous industrial and technological achievements and now learn how to co-exist with the Soviet Union.'

Like tens of millions of other people, that teacher was reflecting an image created by the instruments of modern centralised propaganda.” End quote. Hmm – propaganda, one of the secret societies’ favorite tactics.

Two of the most informative Books available online are Sir Antony Sutton’s The Best Enemy Money Can Buy and America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to The Order of Skull & Bones. Reading those two Books cuts through the propaganda spun by the mainstream media. Unfortunately it seems as if there’s an organized effort to keep Sutton’s Research suppressed. A FACT Pat council on national policy Robertson should be ashamed of. The suppression by the pratt house intertwined mainstream media makes sense; they have to for the rat’s, the bones pack’s, bankster’s and the bilderberg’s etc. survival.

On rare occasions the media provides insight into how sorry many u.s.  government’s agencies are. One example occurred in December 2007 when WFFA, Channel 8 in Dallas, Texas broke the story about the u.s. export-import loaning millions to individuals with known ties to the Juarez and Sinaloa drug cartels. Three paragraphs: “The probe originally revealed that small business loans sponsored by the Export-Import Bank of the United States were made to non-existing companies for equipment that wasn't even real.

Now News 8 has discovered that some of the people who got the Ex-Im Bank loans may have drug connections. The $243 million worth of bad loans were originally made to help trade with Mexico. The loans have been linked to the Juarez drug cartel, which is known for its brutal murders. The cartel killed one dozen people and buried them in a suburban backyard across the border from El Paso. Another loan was linked to the Sinaloa drug cartel, whose business is smuggling heroin into the United States.

The federally funded Ex-Im Bank apparently backed loans to people affiliated with both cartels and the Mexican drug trade. Out of $243 million in the medium-sized loans the Ex-Im Bank backed in Mexico from 2003 through 2005, less than $25 million was ever repaid. The bank, a federal agency, declined to be interviewed on camera by News 8.” End quote.

Those who have read The Best Enemy Money Can Buy are aware of some of the loans made by the ex-im bank to build the U.S.S.R., and the same damn ex-im bank has made loans to build mainland China at U.S. Tax-Payer expense.

In Appendix F Antony lists U.S. companies involved in treasonous activities from 1960-1985. They include AEC (atomic energy), Chase Bank, American Express, General Motors, Ford Motors, General Electric, Alcoa, Boeing, Bechtel, Raytheon, Dresser Industries, IBM, Sperry Rand, Standard Oil, Occidental Petroleum, Monsanto, Intel, Data Corp., McDonnell Douglas, Dupont, Xerox and Lockheed to point out a few.

Which federal agency besides the cia would have been monitoring the communications back and forth setting up the deals? You guessed it, none other than the bilderberg attending national security agency (nsa).

Today is January 4th and on December 30th I read one of the best online posts breaking down the nsa. The piece was written by Mr. T.C. Sottek and posted by The Verge. Mr. Sottek begins with a quote by senator Frank Church in 1975 on Meet The Press. Frank: “I know the capability that is there to make tyranny total in America, and we must see to it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision, so that we never cross over that abyss. That is the abyss from which there is no return.”

Please go to the webpage and read all of it. The graphics, charts, documents and the photo of nsa’s headquarters are important as they provide word pictures I can’t type. They also show how the cia, fbi and nsa work/walk hand in hand behind the scenes.

Mr. Sottek: “On November 4th 1952, a new federal agency was created in secret, chartered with spying on foreign adversaries around the world. There was no mention in the press. There was no discussion on the floor of Congress. The existence of the agency appeared nowhere in the Federal Register.

Since then, much of what the public knows about the National Security Agency has been the stuff of Sneakers and West Wing legend. Its budget — part of the secretive US “black budget” — is largely unknown. The NSA has even been nicknamed “No Such Agency” because of its extreme secrecy. Its headquarters, located in Fort Meade, Maryland, literally resembles a giant black box.

But this year, the box was cracked open.

An unprecedented cache of the NSA’s secrets were stolen in bulk this year by a single independent contractor with administrative access to the intelligence community’s network — a feat unmatched by previous NSA whistleblowers who provided the world mostly with eyewitness accounts of the agency’s behavior. The former contractor, Edward Snowden, fled the United States before teaming up with journalists to disseminate the NSA files, and now resides in Russia where he sought asylum and protection from US prosecution.

We now know that nearly five decades after its creation, the NSA began to operate what would become a global surveillance network of breathtaking scale. Today, it collects records about every phone call placed in the United States. It works with overseas partners and telecommunications companies to directly tap into the arteries of the internet, and scoops up massive amounts of data including emails, chats, VoIP calls, and more. It collects billions of records every year, many belonging to ordinary US citizens with no suspicion of wrongdoing.

Nearly each week since June 5th when The Guardian published the first Snowden documents, new internal files and facts about bulk NSA surveillance have been released. Snowden is said to have leaked upward of 50,000 files from the government. The journalists to whom he's passing the data, like Glenn Greenwald, say more revelations are coming.” Please give some thought to why every time Someone tries to do the Right Thing, They are labeled as traitors or criminals by the powers that be? Bradley Manning, Julian Assange and Edward Snowden are three examples. Peter 20 year house of rats member King asked Hillary bilderberg, sec. of state Clinton to categorize Mr. Assange’s Wikileaks as a foreign terrorist organization. Two paragraphs from the link: "I am calling on the attorney general and supporting his efforts to fully prosecute WikiLeaks and its founder for violating the Espionage Act. And I'm also calling on Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to declare WikiLeaks a foreign terrorist organization," King said on WNIS radio on Sunday evening.

"By doing that, we will be able to seize their funds and go after anyone who provides them help or contributions or assistance whatsoever," he said. "To me, they are a clear and present danger to America." Typical bs spewed by those with seats on gut pile hill. More from Mr. Sottek:


Signals intelligence, or SIGINT, encompasses the interception of electronic signals and communications intelligence, and was an enormous factor in 20th-century wars and diplomacy. In World War I, when radio was still a novel concept, the US and other nations primarily gained access to communications by tapping undersea telephone cables. The United States entered World War I after British intelligence intercepted a coded telegram in which the German Empire proposed that Mexico join Europe’s Central Powers, if the US joined the fight on the side of Britain and France.

The role of SIGINT was dramatically expanded in World War II, which was a truly global war with widespread use of radio and encoded communications. Cryptography and cryptanalysis were essential to all sides, and intensive code-breaking efforts aided Allied forces greatly in their victory.

In 1952, President Harry alfalfa club, master mason Truman issued a memo which led to the creation of the National Security Agency, consolidating the military’s SIGINT responsibilities. In the decades following, the NSA would play a crucial role in signals intelligence during the Cold War, the Vietnam War, and in the modern war on terrorism.

Even before the pivotal national security era that began on September 11th, 2001, the NSA recognized the SIGINT opportunities presented by the internet. In an unclassified December, 2000 transition report, the agency outlined the intelligence landscape, noting “the explosion in global communications,” and a need to be at the forefront of advances in technology. The document states that “to perform both its offensive and defensive missions, NSA must ‘live on the network.’” As leaked documents from Edward Snowden show, the NSA has largely accomplished the mission it envisioned more than a decade ago. But according to critics, it has systematically dodged or violated federal law in doing so.”

Let’s look into a couple of points Mr. Sottek isn’t aware of - the “Cold War” was crafted by the bones pack, the founders of the cia, and cfr rats with help from their chatham hyena friends in high places, meaning queen, pilgrim, chatham patron Elizabeth and her multiple time bilderberg, pilgrim husband the duke of Edinburgh. FACT: whenever tv networks cover England’s royals, they are presented as the finest of people which is the polar opposite of theTruth. Most have few clues into the rest of the story, why Princess Diana broke ranks with England's royals including her bilderberg, pilgrim husband.

“Following 9/11, the NSA’s ability to gather the communications of US citizens was greatly enhanced by the Patriot Act of 2001, the Protect America Act of 2007, the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, and secret interpretations of US law that have only recently begun to enter the public view — interpretations that have surprised and concerned even the Patriot Act’s original authors. Documents leaked this year have revealed that the NSA is operating a massive global surveillance network, one that once seemed only possible in Hollywood fantasy, and that privacy advocates and some politicians fear is highly intrusive, dangerous, and unwarranted. Furthermore, the surveillance of US citizens appears to go well beyond the NSA’s explicit charge of collecting data “for foreign intelligence and counterintelligence purposes” as set forth in Executive Order 12333. Instead of just collecting data on foreigners, the NSA now appears to want all available communications data in the pursuit of terrorists.


If you have a phone and a computer, it’s likely that practically everything you do generates a signal: your bank records, your emails, your phone calls, your text messages, and your sexy Snapchats. At some point, they’re likely to be handled by companies like Google, Facebook, Apple, or AT&T. And like the NSA, your records live on the network.

Unlike documents in a safe or money in a bank vault, your electronic files probably aren’t sitting in one place, especially if they’re handled by global service providers like Google or Yahoo. In the age of global cloud data, it’s possible (even likely) that information you store with a US company is exchanged between servers located outside of US borders.

Because of legal restrictions regarding how the NSA is able to collect and search data, there’s an important distinction between the types of intelligence that the agency scoops up. There’s “content,” which is, naturally, the substantive matter of your communications. That includes the stuff inside your emails, the things you say in your phone calls, and the family photo album you store in Dropbox.

Then there’s “metadata,” which is “data about data:” it’s information about your content. For phone records that includes data like the times, addresses, and durations of phone calls. For email addresses that includes stuff like the IP addresses and the email addresses of the sender and recipient, and the date and time of the email.


One of the NSA’s largest downstream efforts is the “Associational Tracking Program,” a telephone surveillance dragnet which collects phone call metadata from companies including AT&T, MCI, Sprint, and Verizon. A 2006 report from USA Today suggested that the NSA’s goal was to “create a database of every call ever made” within the United States. In June, The Guardian published a secret court order which requires Verizon on an “ongoing, daily basis” to hand the NSA information on all telephone calls made within the US and between the US and other countries: including the numbers of both parties on a call, location data, call duration, unique identifiers, and the time and duration of calls. Obviously, with such a comprehensive and indiscriminate dragnet, millions of phone records are routinely collected on citizens who are not suspected of any wrongdoing.

The other notable downstream effort, also revealed by The Guardian with help from Edward Snowden, is PRISM: a surveillance program that allows the government to store and search for content belonging to people who use services from Google, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, AOL, Yahoo, and other companies. PRISM is an extension of President Bush’s “Terrorist Surveillance Program,” which began with, as the AP reported on June 15th, in-person data requests from the FBI in the years following 9/11. The requests were so extensive that, according to the AP, some inside Microsoft called it “Hoovering” after FBI director J. Edgar master mason Hoover, who notoriously dug up dirt on Americans with impropriety.

Shortly after details about the bulk telephone surveillance program and PRISM were revealed, President bilderberg Obama confirmed their existence, and defended them as limited, legal programs which help to prevent terror attacks. Since the president’s admission, intelligence community officials and supporters in Congress have mounted similar defenses of the programs.


When PRISM was originally reported, The Washington Post and The Guardian suggested something about the program more sinister than reality: that the NSA had “direct access” to the servers of major email and electronic communication providers. While Google, Facebook, and other companies implicated in PRISM collaboration flatly denied any arrangement that would hand the NSA unfettered access to data, the back-and-forth over direct access was window dressing to the NSA’s much larger effort: upstream collection, which sucks data directly from the internet as it passes through the cables that make up the network.

The NSA has developed partnerships with telecommunications companies and foreign intelligence-gathering agencies to gain access to international fiber-optic cables, switches, and routers, allowing it to pull enormous volumes of information from the internet. The most egregious example of the partnership between a telecom giant and the US government came seven years ago, when former technician Mark Klein revealed that the NSA had installed network routing equipment inside a secret room called “641A” at an AT&T switching hub in San Francisco. It’s still unclear how many access points the NSA has developed.

The NSA’s data doesn’t just come from its own wiretaps. As The Guardian notes, most of the world’s communications pass through the US or the UK, giving the NSA a “home-field advantage” when it comes to intercepting traffic. On June 21st, The Guardian reported that the NSA’s British counterpart, the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), also taps fiber-optic lines to intercept and store massive amounts of data on the web. Through a program called Tempora, the data is shared between the UK and the NSA, which have maintained an intimate relationship since World War II.” There we have another example of the anglo-american establishment walking hand in hand behind the scenes.

“Of course, some of the data that passes over those cables is encrypted, and while it’s still not likely that the NSA is able to crack the most powerful standards with brute force, the agency has explored other methods for making encryption a moot point. Over the years, the NSA has worked to insert backdoors in cryptographic standards; the agency has purposefully spread at least one bad algorithm, and NSA algorithms are the basis for many products, including some that protect sensitive government data. The National Institute for Standards and Technology, a federal group that sets national standards for data protection, is now reviewing all of its previous cryptographic recommendations as a result of allegations of NSA meddling. Cryptographers still don’t know how widespread the issue is.

Even more troubling than public internet wiretaps, a November 4th report from The Washington Post revealed that the NSA, through a project called MUSCULAR, allegedly exploits data links in Google and Yahoo’s global networks to tap user data before it’s encrypted. Such data collection is roughly the kind that so worried privacy advocates when PRISM was initially reported, except that this kind of “direct access” to Google and Yahoo’s data is unauthorized by the tech companies. In response to the report, Google executive Eric Schmidt told The Wall Street Journal that “it’s really outrageous that the National Security Agency was looking between the Google data centers, if that’s true.”

Folks if Mr. Sottek was up to speed about the bilderberg pack He would know Schmidt and nsa head Keith Alexander were cuddled up/huddled up together at bilderberg 2011. Three more Americans at bilderberg 2011 were Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes, Pay Pal co-founder Peter has been bed with the cia for years Thiel and Amazon’s ceo Jeff Bezos. Also at bilderberg that year was Douglas Flint, HSBC’s chairman, a bank which has laundered billions for drug cartels. 

Doubters should contact former assistant attorney general Christine bilderberg in 2010, 2011 Varney for confirmation. Eric pop goes the weasel Holder and James fbi director Comey - boys lying lawyers like yourselves don’t fool me. Citizens leaving the bones pack, bilderbergs, trilaterals and the pratt house out of the equation, Our problems begin with the offal pile office, gut pile hill, the dept. of corruption and the reeking, stinking judge/sludge filled supreme court.

Ladies and Gentlemen, Sisters and Brothers - to further my point, as I type Christine A. Varney’s name is between Harold E. Varmus and Patricia C. Vaughan on the pratt rat’s official roster. Let’s return to Mr. Sottek:


Aside from its recent foray into mass data collection for counterterrorism purposes, part of the NSA’s core mission is foreign intelligence. While this activity presents different concerns from the legal issues surrounding collection of data on US citizens, revelations about NSA spying on foreign nations, political leaders, diplomats, militaries, and other organizations has nonetheless caused the US government a great deal of consternation in recent months.

Given the NSA’s original mandate, it’s no real surprise that the agency spies on foreign governments, but several Snowden leaks regarding foreign spying have shed light on the extent of the NSA’s capabilities. The governments of France, Brazil, Germany, and others have harshly criticized US spying efforts, causing an immeasurable amount of diplomatic blowback. But they, too, likely conduct analogous intelligence-gathering efforts; on November 5th, Brazil admitted to spying on US diplomats after it blasted NSA surveillance of the same kind.

While governments spying on each other may not be a surprise to anyone, the leaks show how the NSA has been able to conduct serious intelligence-gathering operations without significant oversight. On October 24th, The Guardian reported that the NSA spied on the phone calls of 35 foreign leaders, including Germany’s Angela Merkel, without the knowledge or approval of President Obama. Obama allegedly spent five years in office without knowing that the NSA was spying on world leaders because, by the NSA’s own account, the agency was conducting too many operations for the president to keep track of.”

Why would nsa be listening to and reading Merkel’s emails? It is all about blackmail. When one of the power brokers steps out of line, blackmail is used to put them back in line, or remove them; it is that simple. Fact: the wolves are cannibalistic; they have no problem eating one of their own. And please don’t lose sight of Merkel was a damn bilderberg before she was made Germany’s chancellor.

Eight more paragraphs: “The government uses several legal pegs to justify its mass surveillance program. Some are based on outdated laws, like the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), while others are based on technical definitions of things like “surveillance” and metadata, which have separate conventional and legal understandings. Even the meaning of “data collection” is up for grabs; in a June 9th interview with NBC’s Andrea alfalfa, bilderberg, pratt Mitchell, the director of national intelligence, James Clapper, deflected criticism for bulk surveillance, saying that “collection of US persons’ data would mean taking [a] book off the shelf and opening it up and reading it.” (The intelligence community argues that unless it actually looks at the data it collects, it hasn’t actually collected any data).

The rules governing what kind of data the government can collect on you from the internet aren’t the same as those which keep it from rifling through your filing cabinet. The ECPA, a law established before things like Gmail existed, allow the government to seize massive amounts of data without warrants, with impunity. Under the ECPA, law enforcement can search your email without a warrant as long as they’ve been stored on cloud servers for at least 180 days and have been declared “relevant” to an investigation, which is a fairly low bar for the government to meet.

Protection for metadata is even worse. An important 1976 court decision in Smith v. Maryland established the government’s key defense of metadata collection. Using the “third party” doctrine, the court decided that the data generated by using telecommunications, like phone call records, count as data “given” to a third party. This means that you have no “reasonable expectation” of privacy for telecommunications metadata. One federal judge even suggested recently that the only way you should expect privacy is to keep your phone turned off.

The ECPA and Smith v. Maryland don’t authorize the kind of mass spying we now see today, but compliment other laws that have been interpreted in secret to allow mass surveillance. The NSA’s surveillance programs rely on two key statutes, section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act (FAA) and Section 215 of the Patriot Act. The FAA allows the collection of communications content under programs like PRISM, while the Patriot Act authorizes the collection of metadata from phone companies.

There is currently no clear path to reform. All three branches of US government have, in some measure, enabled, allowed, or justified the existence and continued use of unprecedented NSA programs that collect data on American citizens.

President bilderberg Obama, who is the NSA’s top brass as commander-in-chief of the US military, has shown no genuine interest in reforming the agency. In addition to broadly defending the bulk surveillance programs before the public, his NSA review panel — created in response to leaks from Edward Snowden — is filled with insiders who are unlikely to provoke change.

Congress, which is responsible for oversight of the intelligence community, is currently divided on the issue of mass surveillance. It has arguably failed to fully meet its oversight role, neglecting to collect adequate information from the NSA about its activities, and opting not to hold intelligence officials accountable for blatantly lying to Congress and the public. For instance Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and NSA Director Keith bilderberg Alexander each, in separate Congressional hearings, testified that the NSA was not collecting data on US persons. In fact, it has been collecting data on billions of phone records and other information belonging to US citizens.

The current chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Senator Dianne alfalfa, bilderberg, pratt, trilateral Feinstein (D-CA), is one of the most ardent supporters of NSA bulk surveillance and originally downplayed the Verizon leak as business-as-usual. In October, Feinstein took out an op-ed in USA Today, arguing that metadata deserves no Fourth Amendment protection. On October 31st, Feinstein passed an NSA “improvement” bill in Congress offering no real reform; in fact, the Feinstein bill legitimizes the mass data collection that has so far been justified in secret.” End quote. I don't understand how Californians have voted for Feinstein all these years; it makes no sense to me.

Let the record show Barack Obama and Keith Alexander go way back. Everyone’s proof – nsa director Alexander was invited to bilderberg 2008 with Barack and Hillary. That can be confirmed or denied by Microsoft’s Craig pratt rat Mundie. Bottom line - of course Goggle, Facebook, Pay Pal, Amazon and Microsoft etc. will deny being in bed with the cia, fbi and nsa. AMERICA one of the Keys to Revealing wolves is knowing who they meet with in secret service protected secrecy. (In a nutshell, one of my jobs is to fill in blanks, connect the dots which most of AMERICA'S Well Intended writers have overlooked.)

And for those who believe senator Patrick Leahy is a good guy, when the alfalfa pack dined in 2011, Leahy and John house of rats Dingell sat at the head of table 3. Another diner at table 3 was former national security advisor for Obama, gen. James bilderberg, pratt, trilateral Jones. Citizens what are the odds Susan national security advisor, pratt, trilateral Rice Cameron will dine with the alfalfas this year?

In regards to Leahy, I know of two times when he told the truth, once was on September 17, 2008 when discussing the anthrax letters with Robert cover-up Mueller. The fbi said Dr. Bruce Ivins was the sender of the letters and he acted alone. Leahy: “I believe there are others involved, either as accessories before or accessories after the fact, I believe that there are others out there. I believe there are others who could be charged with murder." Leahy wouldn’t come out and say it, so I will; the cia was behind the anthrax letters. Please read the first half of this and look at the photo of Jenna Bush, George skull junior’s daughter, published by The National Enquirer. Next connect the dots to Mr. Robert Stevens, who worked in the Enquirer’s head office in Florida and was a “photo editor”. Robert was the first person killed by an anthrax letter. More reading at the link shows why the New York Post received an anthrax letter. Some articles the Post published in June and September 2001:

BOOZING BUSH TWIN NEARLY IN THE CLEAR – by Deborah Orin; New York Post; Sep 7, 2001; pg. 015

BUSTED BUSH BABES MAKE DIFFERENT BOOZE PLEAS – by Marilyn Rauber Post Correspondent; New York Post; Jun 9, 2001; pg. 002

DOUBLE SHOT: BUSH TWINS BOTH NAILED – by Jordan Smith in Austin, Texas and Deborah Orin in Washington; New York Post; Jun 1, 2001; pg. 005

For seven years we were told al-qaeda or Saddam Hussein were behind the anthrax letters by the same damn media which pushes the lie - fires caused the Twin Towers to collapse; lies the wolves know they cannot prove if put to a test.

AMERICA, building and testing models of the South Tower and #7 will bring the wolves’ house of lies, their house of cards tumbling to the ground.

An Important Point overlooked by Mr. Sottek and other writers is - since nsa reads and stores all the emails the agency desires and records any and all phone conversations the agency desires  – how is it that organized crime including the drug cartels operate with more or less impunity?

Before continuing on that thought let’s look into the affair between David pratt rat Petraeus and his biographer Paula Broadwell while Petraeus was director – central intelligence. Did Petraeus expect his emails to surface? Of course he didn’t, and their affair is the least of our problems. What should concern US are the phone calls & emails between the power brokers which never see the Light of Day. It’s not like all their plans are made at bilderberg and trilateral conclaves. How about the phone calls and emails between members of the bones pack? And let no one forget John Kerry & Austan Goolsbee were at bilderberg 2012.

I know the u.s. government listens to anyone they want to because of discussions with an individual who used to be on a government payroll. I was told First Hand, not by someone else, the individual’s job was to listen to and record phone conversations.

I don’t know who decided to throw Petraeus under a mini-bus due to the fact he was invited to bilderberg 2013. Petraeus’ home life may have changed because of the affair but not his stature amongst players. His name appears on their official list of 2013 invitees between Richard Perle – “Resident Fellow American Enterprise Institute” and Portugal’s Paolo Portas – “Minister of State and Foreign Affairs”. And yes indeed Eric Google Schmidt was one of the money hungry whores huddled up with former cia director, pratt Petraeus, David prime minister Cameron, Peter in bed with the cia Thiel, Vernon bankster, lawyer Jordan, Henry bastard Kissinger, Jacob bankster Wallenburg, Robert pratt house co-chair, former treasury secretary Rubin; hsbc group chairman, Douglas son of a bitch Flint; Peter goldman sachs’ international chairman Sutherland, Jeff Amazon Bezos, Christine international money fund Lagarde, Microsoft’s Craig pratt rat Mundie and Ian hyena Davis - the chairman of Rolls-Royce, the firm that supplied the U.S.S.R. with their latest in jet engive technology in 1946 to facilitate getting the Soviet's mig series of jets off the ground for a war over Korea. 

Along a similar train of thought - isn’t it comforting the fbi’s current director, James Comey, was asked to sit on hsbc’s board? Sisters and Brothers it is all a game within a game. A game in which We the People have been designated as the losers.

Where is Petraeus today, according to this press release the bilderberg’s now a senior vice-lice president inside the royal united services institute headed by the duke of Kent, prince pilgrims society, master mason William, the grand master of England’s masons, and queen Elizabeth’s cousin. Bottom line - England’s royals are undeniable illuminati supporters.

One paragraph from a Reuters’ May 30, 2013 press release: “Private equity firm Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co (KKR.N) said it appointed former CIA Director David Petraeus as chairman of the newly created KKR Global Institute, which will study the investment implications of global macroeconomic, social and geopolitical issues.” Two more money grubbing whores at bilderberg 2013 were Henry Kravis – “Co-Chairman and Co-CEO, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.” and Marie Kravis – “Senior Fellow and Vice Chair, Hudson Institute.” As I type Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co is between Kingdon Capital Management and Lazard on the list of pratt house corporate sponsors.